Mar 022013
 

February is over, so I updated my page of stuff I’ve read, and here’s my thoughts on The Incrementalists, free of summary, spoilers, or character names.

First off, this is a great book if you’re into keeping neurotic lists as though you were going to make character trading cards. There’s a strong secret history concept to it, and the way the secret society works involves ‘switches’, sense-memory triggers that can be used to influence people. (My switches would probably be miso soup, lilacs, Andrew Lloyd Webber’s Phantom of the Opera, and big friendly dogs.) This group uses their influence to do good things, which is refreshing considering all the stories out there that use bad emotional triggers for dark reasons. Triggering bad memories isn’t necessarily stronger, but it is easier, and therefore seems a bit lazy.

There’s a lot of love-story going on, and I often denounce the fact that it seems like all the songs and stories are about love, but here I’m not complaining. Everyone involved in the central love affair has agency (even when they’ve been manipulated). There’s no love-interest-as-a-reward crap, and the payoff of the romance is strong and thoughtful. There’s a scene with coffee in bed that is the loveliest, realest moment between lovers I’ve read all year. The sweet fragility of what they’re feeling makes the reader yearn for a new romance, but the narrative still deals with the awkwardness and hard parts; their love is magical without being trite. Contrasting that NRE is a whole cast of well-drawn characters. One uses love as a tool instead of appreciating it, in a dark reflection of how the Incrementalists as a whole use emotions. Another is thwarted in love, and turns it to bitterness and then problem-solving momentum. Yet another character has this pleasant sort of French love for all his comrades.

The setting is Las Vegas (a town I thought I hated until I spent a fantastic weekend there) and there’s a love-letter-to-a-city aspect that works nicely. I like when a book really makes the setting an integral feature rather than just grudgingly sketching a place and then letting it fade to the background. When the plot, setting, and characters are skillfully interwoven, the story gets so much deeper in my head.

Anyway, I’m just in love with this book, and I think a lot of other people will be too.

  4 Responses to “Magical, Not Trite”

  1. Yay! I’m so glad you liked it. I think “magical, not trite” is about my favorite description of love yet — any love, now I think of it. ::grinning::

  2. I’m another early reader who loved this book. Thank you, Jenphalian, for articulating some of the reasons why. A great example, as well, of the synergy created when two great authors co-create:;like a great set of music, you could probably tease out who did what, but you don’t want to because the harmony is so much sweeter than the sum of its parts.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)